<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Research Proves Owning a Cat Is Good for Your Heart	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cats.com/science-proves-owning-a-cat-is-good-for-your-heart/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cats.com/science-proves-owning-a-cat-is-good-for-your-heart</link>
	<description>In-depth cat product reviews, behavior guides, and vet-written education on symptoms, diseases, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 01:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lorraine Deyoung		</title>
		<link>https://cats.com/science-proves-owning-a-cat-is-good-for-your-heart#comment-66627</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorraine Deyoung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 01:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cats.com/?p=31832#comment-66627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I love it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anne		</title>
		<link>https://cats.com/science-proves-owning-a-cat-is-good-for-your-heart#comment-54616</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 18:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cats.com/?p=31832#comment-54616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree, Tony. There are many studies of this kind. However I have never seen a scientific description of the direct causal link. 

Perhaps, neurotransmitters? I too would like a credible, detailed description of precisely *why*.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Tony. There are many studies of this kind. However I have never seen a scientific description of the direct causal link. </p>
<p>Perhaps, neurotransmitters? I too would like a credible, detailed description of precisely *why*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony Horowitz		</title>
		<link>https://cats.com/science-proves-owning-a-cat-is-good-for-your-heart#comment-54577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Horowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cats.com/?p=31832#comment-54577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All I see in the descriptions of the studies is that certain correlations were noted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I see in the descriptions of the studies is that certain correlations were noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony Horowitz		</title>
		<link>https://cats.com/science-proves-owning-a-cat-is-good-for-your-heart#comment-54576</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Horowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cats.com/?p=31832#comment-54576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is no indication in the descriptions of any of these studies indicating how a causal connection can be inferred, or even the direction of the causal connection if there is one (why can&#039;t we explain the results as suggesting that people with a tendency towards better heart health are more likely to want to own cats?) Is it the scientific studies that are sloppy here, or your description of them? How do you justify the causal connection indicated in the title of this text, and in several assertions made in the body of the text?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no indication in the descriptions of any of these studies indicating how a causal connection can be inferred, or even the direction of the causal connection if there is one (why can&#8217;t we explain the results as suggesting that people with a tendency towards better heart health are more likely to want to own cats?) Is it the scientific studies that are sloppy here, or your description of them? How do you justify the causal connection indicated in the title of this text, and in several assertions made in the body of the text?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
